115. After the Court of Appeal Ruling, the case was assigned to Justice Fauz Twaib of the High Court. In his ruling of 23 May 2011, Justice there Twaib stated that “... where is proof that the full payment according to the Court’s order has been made, no certificate should be issued... The rationale for this is clear: issuing a certificate for amounts not currently due would not only be academic...but may confuse matters and even result in wrongful payments being made...”.The learned Judge went on to state that “from the foregoing, and on the application, basis there of the is no material made entitlement that available to me remains unpaid in this by the Respondent...If anything, there was an overpayment to those whose house allowance was wrongly included in their Annual Emoluments...”. by stating that “since my findings are He concluded that there is no shortfall, the applicants cannot Pensionable get what they are seeking. This Court cannot issue the certificate sought. Therefore, | hereby dismiss this application in its entirety”. 116. According to the Respondent, after the ruling of Justice Twaib of23 May 2011, the Applicants applied for leave of the High Court on 6 June 2011 to appeal to the Court of Appeal, and the application was struck out on the basis of a defective affidavit. The Applicants again applied to the High Court for leave for extension of time to file an appeal, October, and the 2012. The same was also struck out with cost, on 11 Respondent submits further that, on 25 Octobe 2012, the Applicants filed another application for extension of time to a Ae