87. The Court will now proceed to analyse the arguments put forward by the Respondent in this regard. 1.) Identity of the Applicants 88. Article “Indicate 56(1) their Respondent of the authors Charter even if the provides that Applications latter request shall anonymity”. The submits that the Application before this Court is brought under the name of Karata Ernest and Others v. Tanzania, and not the Applicants. 89. The Court admits that the Application was filed in the name of Karata Ernest and Others. However, the Court amended the name to Frank David Omary and Others. The fact that Karata Ernest dissociated himself from the Application does not render the identity of the other Applicants void. 90. The properly Court therefore identified and rules thus the that the Applicants Application requirement under Article 56(1) of the owe have complies been with the Se R Ze wee i A Ss