61.
The Respondent consequently calls on the Court to declare the
Application
relating
inadmissible
to the
claim
both
with
respect
for compensation
as
to
well
alleged
violations
as
that
of Police
REGARD
TO THE
brutality.
IV-
POSITION
OF THE
PRELIMINARY
APPLICANTS
WITH
OBJECTIONS
RAISED
BY
THE
RESPONDENT
Arguments
against objections
raised under Article 56 of the
Charter and Rule40 of the Rules
1.) Identity of the Applicants
62.
The
Applicants
Respondent's
on
their
Response
that
part
submit
“the
in their
Applicants
in
Reply
to
the
the
present
Application are not claiming to represent all the ex-EAC employees...
The
Applicants
mandate
from
in the
Karata
present
Ernest
Application
and
his
are
not
colleagues.
claiming
any
So
not
it is
understood why Karata Ernest and his colleagues are pulling out and
dissociating
themselves
from
the
present
Application.
The
proper
case from which they could pull out would be Civil Case No. 93/2003.
But this case was extinguished
by the Deed of Settlement.
reason to rename Application No. 001/2012
and Others v. The
quite proper’.
For this
as Frank David Omary
vernment of the United Republic of Tanzania is