00 0 896 notes that the claim is not supported with evidence. The prayer is consequenfly dismissed ii. a Non-material loss Loss incurred by the Applicant 130. The Court notes that the Applicant requests for compensation in the tune of Tanzania shillings Eight Hundred Miltion (Tzs B0o,oo0,o0o) for inhuman and degrading treatment, and US Dollars Twenty Thousand ($ 20,ooo) for the pain and anguish he suffered. 131. The Court recalls that violation of the right to dignity is a grave breach that diminishes humanity. ln the instant matter, the conditions in which the Applicant was arrested and the consequences that ensued, especially with respect to his family, were detrimental to his well-being, reputation and honor. However, the amounts claimed by the Applicant are excessive. The Court deems it fair to grant the amount of Tanzania Shillings Ten Miflion (TZS b. 1O,OO0,O0O). Loss incurred by the Applicanfs family 132. The Applicant requests for compensation in the tune of Burundian Franc Eighty Million (FBU 80,000,000) for the arbitrary prosecution of his family in Criminat Case No. 765 of 2006 in respect of their residence. 133. The court observes that upon the intervention of the DRC Embassy in Dar es Salaam, the Respondent State withdrew the case and atlowed the Applicant to stay for seven (7) years while he agreed to his family leaving the country. The Court is of the view that it runs contrary to that agreement and good faith to find against the Respondent State while it brought the said prosecution to an end to the satisfaction of the Applicant. Furthermore, that claim was not substantiated as a consequential violation. The Court therefore declines the request for compensation 32