000 8s e 117. As this Court has earlier found, the Respondent State violated the Applicant,s rights to residence and freedom of movement, to integrity, to dignity and to be tried within a reasonable time protected underArticles 1z(1),4,5 and 7(1Xd) of the Charter, respectively. Responsibility and causation have therefore been established. The prayers for reparation are being considered against these findings. 1 18. The Court notes that the Applicant requests for reparations with respect to both material and non-material damages. The Applicant's claims for material damage must be supported by evidence. The court has also previously held that the purpose of reparations is resfifuo in integrum, which is to place the victim, as much as possible, in the situation prior to the violation, not richer or poorer.22 1 19' With respect to non-material damage, as this Court has previously held, prejudice is assumed in cases of human rights violations23 and evaluating the quantum of non-pecuniary damage must be made in fairness and taking into account the circumstances of the case.2a The Court has adopted the practice of affording lump sums in such circumstances.25 120. The Court notes that the Applicant's claims for reparations are made in different currencies. ln this respect, the Court is of the view that, taking into account the principle of fairness and considering that the Applicant should not be madeto bear the fluctuations that are inherent in financial activities, the choice of currency will be made on a case-by-case basis. As a general principle, damages should be awarded, where possible, in the currency in which loss was incurred.26 Given that, in the present case, the Respondent State does not object to the fact that 05/06/2015 (Reparatio_ns), Norbgrt Zongo and Others v. Burkina Faso (hereinafter referred to as "Norbefi Zongo and others v. Byrkina Faso (Reparations)'), gs zo-sr; Appri;ation No. oo4r2o13. Judgment of.03/06/2016 (Reparations), LohE tssa'Konate i.'airiina raio inZiinaner refened to as "Loh6 lssa Konat, v. Burkina Faso (Reparations)), SS 52-59; and Reverend Ciristopner n. Mtikita v. Tanzania (Reparations), SS 27-29. See Norbert Zongo and Others v. Burkina Faso (Reparations), SS 57-62 zz ldem, S 55; and Lohd /ssa Konate v. Burkina Faso (Reparations), g 58 24 See Norberl Zongo and Others v. Burkina aso (Reparations), g 61 25 /dem, g 62 26 See Application No. 003/201 d t ot O7 11212018 (Reparations), tngabire Vic Republic Rwanda ,s45 22 29 Umuhoza v.