D. Other admissibility requirements in relation to proceedings against the lawyers 83. The Court notes from the records that the Parties do not dispute that the Application complies with the requirements of Article 56 (1), (2), (3), (and (7) of the Charter, as restated in Rule 50(2) (a), (c), (b), (d), and (g) of the Rules. Nevertheless, the Court must ensure that these requirements are met. 84. The Court notes that it emerges from the record that the requirement under Rule 50(2)(a) of the Rules is met insofar as the Applicant has clearly indicated his identity. 85. The Court further notes that the Application does not contain disparaging or insulting language against the Respondent State, which makes it compatible with the requirement contained in Rule 50(2)(c) of the Rules. 86. Regarding the requirement contained in Rule 50(2)(d) of the Rules, the Court notes that the Application is not based exclusively on news disseminated through the mass media but on judicial documents. The Court therefore finds that the Application complies with the aforementioned provision. 87. Finally, as regards the requirement of Rule 50(2)(g) of the Rules, the Court finds that the present case does not concern a matter which has already been settled by the Parties in accordance with the principles of the United Nations Charter, the Constitutive Act of the African Union or the provisions of the Charter. 88. In view of the foregoing, the Court holds that with regard to the complaints against the Applicant’s lawyers before the Constitutional Court, the Application meets all the admissibility requirements in Article 56 of the Charter as restated in Rule 50(2) of the Rules and thus declares the Application admissible. 23