7. He avers that the Public Prosecutor claimed that the Victim had committed arson on a property belonging to one Mr. El Sayed Hassan Omar Abu Zaid Saleh, and even though Mr El Sayed testified otherwise and even signed an official document to the contrary, the Public Prosecutor still insisted on the continued detention of the Victim. 8. The Complainant further alleges that the Public Prosecutor later fabricated another charge against the Victim and referred him to the Military Judiciary where Case No. 1793 of year 2015 was filed against him. 9. The Complainant alleges that while in Victim was tortured with the others arre inhumane treatment, including: putti ‘ e Mazalah prison, the and was subjected to in a tiny, poorly I inister, Mohamed Ibrahim; (iv) the atiekcitt ) the former Prime Minister, Hazem Beblawi; or adjudication and that the Complaint has been accordance with, Article 56(6) of the outcome/judgements of the Egyptian courts on that they could know whether the courts could not, which they later realized was impossible. filed within a reasonable time in Charter, after awaiting the the issues placed before them so deliver qualitative judgment or 13. Regarding the need to exhaust domestic remedies, the Complainant submits that the exhaustion of domestic remedies after the coup is totally impossible, because following the coup which upstaged the democratically elected government of the 2 Mr. Mohammed Hamed Hamed Elshehna.