not, the manner or style in which the reliefs are couched, but the effect of their grant by the Court determines whether or not they are enforcement or declaratory reliefs. At paragraphs 6.2 and 6.4 of the Plaintiff’s initiating application, these, inter alia, are the issues he is inviting this Court to resolve: 6.2 “Whether the Plaintiff is not entitled to have the judgment of this Honourable Court entered in his favour enforced against the 1st Defendant?” 6.4 “Whether this is not an appropriate situation where this Honourable Court should make an order mandating the 16th & 17th Defendants and the Authority of Heads of State and Government of ECOWAS to impose the sanctions prescribed in Article 77 of ECOWAS Revised Treaty on the 1st defendant for its refusal and/or neglect to comply with the decision and orders of this Honourable Court?” The Plaintiff prays this Court to resolve these issues among others; in his favour by arguing and submitting, inter alia, that Article 15(4) of ECOWAS Revised Treaty, Articles 19(2) and 22(3) of the Protocol, A/P.1/7/91 on the Community Court of Justice and 24(1) to (5) of the Supplementary Protocol, (A/SP.1/01/05) on the Community Court of Justice beg for an interpretation the effect of which is capable of sustaining his claims. These provisions are reproduced hereunder for ease of reference and they provide as follows: 10