88. The Court considers that in these circumstances, by prohibiting the establishment and issuance of the certificate of nationality to persons simply because they are wanted by the law, or by declaring such a certificate null and void, the Order of 22 July 2019 arbitrarily deprives them of the enjoyment of nationality. 89. The Court therefore finds that by virtue of the Order of 22 July 2019, the Respondent State violated the right to nationality under Article 5 of the Charter and Article 15 of the UDHR. VIII. REPARATIONS 90. The Applicant requests the Court to Order the Respondent State to bring the Inter-ministerial Order of 22 July 2019 in compliance with international human rights standards. 91. The Respondent State submits that the Court should declare the alleged violations unfounded and consequently dismiss the Applicant’s request for reparation. *** 92. Article 27(1) of the Protocol provides that: “If the Court finds that there has been violation of a human or peoples’ right, it shall make appropriate Orders to remedy the violation, including the payment of fair compensation”. 93. The Court notes that it has found that the inter-ministerial Order of 22 July 2019 violates the right to be presumed innocent and the right to nationality protected by Article 7(1)(b) of the Charter, and Articles 5 of the Charter and 15 of the UDHR respectively. 94. Consequently, the Court orders the Respondent State to take all measures to revoke the inter-ministerial Order of 22 July 2019. 23