Charter. The Court, therefore, finds that the Respondent State’s responsibility has been established. The prayers for reparations will, therefore, be examined against these findings. A. Pecuniary reparations 149. The Applicant claims pecuniary reparations for both the material and moral prejudice, which he alleges is a result of the violations suffered due to the Respondent State’s conduct. i. Material prejudice 150. With respect to material prejudice, the Applicant prays the Court to order the Respondent State to pay the Applicant Thirty-Six Million Tanzanian Shillings (TSH 36,000,000) as compensation for the loss of his employment as assistant security officer following the violation of his rights. The Applicant claims that his monthly salary was One Hundred and Fifty Thousand Tanzanian Shillings (TSH 150,000), which enabled him to pay for the school fees of his children. He considers that since he has been a victim for twenty (20) years, his compensation should be calculated based on his monthly salary multiplied with twenty (20) years or two hundred and forty (240) months. * 151. The Respondent State submits that this claim has no basis. The Respondent State contends that the Applicant has not attached anything to support the claim that was employed and was paid a monthly salary of One Hundred and Fifty Thousand Tanzanian Shillings (TSH 150,000). Furthermore, the Respondent State asserts that the Applicant has failed to provide proof of relationship between him and the alleged children. The Respondent State, therefore, humbly submits that the Applicant has failed to substantiate his claim and hence is not entitled to any reparations or compensation. *** 36