000089 such remedies would not be feasible because a member of the Republican Guard was involved the time limit for filing a case before nationaljurisdictions has elapsed upon the completion of the proceedings before the administrative and political il authorities. 36. With regard to the first allegation, the Court holds that the Appticant affirms that the proceedings before the Respondent State's judicial authorities are not feasible, without adducing evidence in support of this allegation. The court, therefore, dismisses the allegations. 37. With regard to the second allegation, the Court notes that the Applicant did not file his case before the national courts, as he claims to have sought to setle the dispute before the administrative and political authorities. However, there was nothing preventing him from exercising both judicial and non-judicial remedies at the same time, and should therefore have exercised the requisite judicial remedies so as to exhaust the local remedies. 38. ln light of the foregoing, the Court holds in conclusion that the Applicant has not exhausted the local remedies available to him in the Respondent State, and his failure to exhaust local remedies does not fallwithin the exceptions set out in Rule a0(5) of the Rules. VII. COSTS 39 ' The Court notes that Rule 30 of the Rules provides that: " Untess otherwise decided by the Court, each party shall bear its own costs.', 5 Alex Thomas v. Tanzania,lbid, S 140 1 a_-