Previous 14 / 61 Next

(~C".. ~ ACHPR . f f) African Commission on a~ _ Human Rights our Collective Responsibility Human and Peoples' Rights fact, or, in the words of the African Charter, their procedure would probably be unduly prolonged."13 57. In the present Communication, the Complainants contended that the Respondent State's disregard for the rule of law in combination with a general climate of fear fostered by the Respondent State, which includes recent government campaign against human rights activists, lawyers, journalists, marginalised communities and the raids against the populations of South Kordofan and Blue Nile, renders any potential remedy unavailable, as it exposes the Victims who seek to pursue legal avenues to significant risks to their security. . 58. The Commission recognised in Anuak Justice Council v Ethiopia that a remedy may only be deemed available "if the petitioner can pursue it without impediments or if he can make use of it in the circumstances of his case. The word~available' means readily obtainable; 'accessible' or 'attainable, reachable" .14 ThEtConlmission also held in John D. Ouko v Kenya that domestic remedies need not be exhausted where doing so would put victims at risk of their life.Is '_·'t'" . 59. The Respondent State's campaign against human rights activists, lawyers, journalists, marginalised communities and individuals in South Kordofan and Blue Nile demonstrate the genuine risk to victims seeking to take judicial steps with a view to holding those responsible for human rights violations to account. The Complainants submitted that human rights violations continue to be committed in South Kordofan and Blue Nile on a daily basis with complete impunity. No specific provisions exist in Sudanese law or practice that would provide victims with protection. Under these circumstances, it would be "reversing the clock of justice to request the complainants to attempt to exhaust local remedies."16 Therefore, for the aforementioned reasons and in line with its established jurisprudence, the Commission finds that domestic remedies were not available for the Victims because of fear for their lives and existing risks to their security. 60. The Complainants also submitted that local remedies are not effective as there exists broad provisions for immunities for SAP soldiers and Sudanese security 13 "'" O'gen of Ihe African '"/''''~''' · Unlon 'in.,'·. I ,

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Communication 402/11 & 420/12 - Sudanese Civilians in South Kordofan and Blue Nile (represented by Sudan Democracy First Group, REDRESS, Human Rights v. Sudan

ACHPR Decision

Preview

Type of Document

Decision

Keywords

Arbitrary Arrest and Detention
Cruel and Degrading Treatment
Enforced disappearance
Equality
Equality Before the Law
Extra-Judicial Killings
Free Disposal of Wealth and Natural Resources
Freedom from Discrimination
Freedom of Movement
Land Rights
Protection of Family and Vulnerable Groups
Rape
Right to Fair Trial
Right to Family
Right to Health
Right to Information
Right to Information / Digital Rights
Right to Life
Right to Property
Right to Self-Determination
Rights of Minority Communities
Serious and Massive Violation of Human Rights
Sexual and Gender Based Violence
Sexual Offences
Violations Resulting from Warfare and Military Operations

Case Head Notes: In 2011 the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), and militia groups under SAF control, launched a series of assaults, including aerial bombardment, against citizens in South Kordofan state, and Blue Nile state. The SAF targetted refugee camps, civillian dwellings, schools, hospitals, refugee camps and fields used for food cultivation. The Complainants state that the government has made its intention, to cleanse the two states of the ethnic groups that live there, clear, and reference a video in which the govnenor of South Kordofan told SAF to "take no prisoners... hand over the place swept, rubbed, crushed." The Commission found a violation of Article 4, noting that the indiscriminate bombing of civilian areas amounted to an arbitrary deprivation of life by state security forces. The Commission found a violation of Article 5 stating that rape and sexual violence, other violent assaults, enforced disappearances, and the ill-treatment and torment of individuals who were arrested and detained, all amounted to a violation of Article 5. The Commission found a violation of Article 6, noting the widespread artbitrary detentions that were made, primarily, on the basis of an individuals perceived opposition to the government. They further state that the existence of conflict in the affected regions does not justify any arbitray measures adopted by agents of the Respondent State. The Commission found a violation of Article 7, noting that the incommunicado detention of hundreds of civilians, without trial amounted to a clear violation. The Commission found a violation of Article 9, stating that people had been deliberately cut-off from access to media coverage of the violations committed. The Commission found a violation of Article 12, stating that the failure of the Respondent State to prevent or mitigate the involuntary movement, or forced displacement, of the civilian populations, or to protect those who have been forcibly displaced, amounted to a violation. Noting the destruction of homes, buildings, and cultivated land, the Commission found a violation of Article 14, on account of depriving civilians of the lawful enjoyment of property. The Commission found a violation of Article 16 stating that the failure of the Respondent State to provide basic services such as drinking water, electricity, and medicine, by itself contravenes Article 16, and that the deliberate prevention of these basic services in the affected regions amounted to a flagrant violation. Specifically, the bombing of civilian homes, and resulting forced displacement, negatively affected civilians rights to basic services, which violated their right to health. The Commission also found that the forced displacement of civlians violated Article 18. The Commission found violations of Articles 2 and 18(3), and stated that sexual assaults are acts of gender-based violence, and that investigating, prosecuting, and punishing offenders is a mandatory element of the Respondent State's duty to prevent discrimination. They further note there is no evidence that the Respondent State fulfilled its obligation to prevent discrimination based on gender, sex, colour, origin, ethnicity, or political opinion. The Commission found violations of Articles 19, 20, 21 and 23 becasue they noted that the Respondent State specifically targetted the Nuba people (Article 19), that the loss of life, destruction of property and forced displacement threatened the existence of the Nuba as a distinct people (Article 20), that the destruction of homes and cultivated land in the Nuba mountains effectively denied the inhabitants the right to freely dispose of their wealth (Article 21), and that the attacks on civilian villages by state forces, and failure of the Respondent State to take any measures to prevent the disruptions of peace and security, or to investigate and punish violators, contravened Article 23. The Commission found a violation of Article 3 because the Respondent State did not protect the Nuba people, or women, children, and ethnic minorities in the same way that it protected the dominate sectors of the Sudanese population. On account of the other established Charter violations, the Commission also found a violation of Article 1. In Paragraph 282, the Commission makes a list of recommendations, including urging the Respondent State to: set up an independent inquiry to investigate the violations, ratify the Maputo Protocol and Kampala Convention, immediately release all arbitrarily detained civilians, facilitate unimpeded access by humanitarian aid groups, allow access for international monitors, provide housing and basic needs to displaced persons, and ensure the safe return of displaced persons to their communities.

Country

Sudan

Outcome: Decided on Merits

Year Decided: Mar 7, 2023

Rights Alleged to be Violated (ACHPR Provisions)

ACHPR 7: Right to Fair Trial
ACHPR 7.1: Right to be Heard
ACHPR 9: Right to Receive Information and Free Expression
ACHPR 1: General Obligations
ACHPR 12: Right to Freedom of Movement
ACHPR 14: Right to Property
ACHPR 16: Right to Health
ACHPR 18: Protection of the Family and Vulnerable Groups
ACHPR 19: Right of All Peoples to Equality and Rights
ACHPR 2: Freedom from Discrimination
ACHPR 20 : Right to Self-Determination
ACHPR 21: Right to Free Disposal of Wealth and Natural Resources
ACHPR 23: Right to National and International Security and Peace
ACHPR 3: Right to Equality before the Law and Equal Protection of the Law
ACHPR 4: Right to Life and Integrity
ACHPR 5: Cruel Inhuman and Degrading Treatment
ACHPR 6 : Right to Personal Liberty and Protection from Arbitrary Arrest
ACHPR 7.1.a: Right to Sue for Remedy before a Competent Tribunal
ACHPR 9.1: Right to Receive Information

Rights Violated (ACHPR Provisions)

ACHPR 7: Right to Fair Trial
ACHPR 7.1: Right to be Heard
ACHPR 9: Right to Receive Information and Free Expression
ACHPR 1: General Obligations
ACHPR 12: Right to Freedom of Movement
ACHPR 12.1: Right to freedom of movement and residence within borders of State of legal residence
ACHPR 14: Right to Property
ACHPR 16: Right to Health
ACHPR 18: Protection of the Family and Vulnerable Groups
ACHPR 19: Right of All Peoples to Equality and Rights
ACHPR 2: Freedom from Discrimination
ACHPR 20 : Right to Self-Determination
ACHPR 21: Right to Free Disposal of Wealth and Natural Resources
ACHPR 21.1: People's right to freely dispose of their wealth and natural resources
ACHPR 21.2: Right to the lawful recovery of property by dispossessed people
ACHPR 23: Right to National and International Security and Peace
ACHPR 3: Right to Equality before the Law and Equal Protection of the Law
ACHPR 3:2: Every individual shall be entitled to equal protection of the law.
ACHPR 4: Right to Life and Integrity
ACHPR 6 : Right to Personal Liberty and Protection from Arbitrary Arrest
ACHPR 7.1.a: Right to Sue for Remedy before a Competent Tribunal
ACHPR 9.1: Right to Receive Information

Duration of Procedure

Jul 21, 2011 ~ Mar 7, 2023

Country Geolocation

Latitude: 12.862807

Longitude: 30.217636

Country Geolocation (linked ACHPR Decision): Sudan

Primary Documents

Sudanese Civilians in South Kordofan and Blue Nile v Sudan.pdf
English
ML TOC
Download View

African Human Rights CLA 2.0

Select target paragraph3

Communication 402/11 & 420/12 - Sudanese Civilians in South Kordofan and Blue Nile (represented by Sudan Democracy First Group, REDRESS, Human Rights v. Sudan

Primary Documents

Notifications