registered as a voter on the voters roll for that constituency, the voter registration officer shall, pursuant to the claim form and subject to this Part, enter the claimant’s name and the particulars relating to him or her on that voters roll. (4) If, on receipt of a claim form in which the claimant seeks registration in a constituency in which he or she is not resident, the Commission is satisfied that it is appropriate for the claimant to be registered in that constituency, the Commission shall direct the appropriate voter registration officer to enter the claimant’s name and particulars relating to him or her on the voters roll for his or her constituency. (5) If a voter registration officer considers that a claimant should be registered on the voters roll for some other constituency, the vro shall forward the claim to the constituency registrar for that other constituency and shall advise the claimant accordingly. (6) The Commission, any voter registration officer or any officer of the Commission may demand from any claimant proof of identity or proof of residence in that constituency or both of the foregoing. (7) Any applicant aggrieved by any decision of the Commission or voter registration officer made under this section may lodge a complaint with the Commission in terms of section one hundred and ninety. 72 Persons who may vote by post Where an election is to be held in a constituency, a person who is registered as a voter on the roll for that constituency shall be entitled to vote by post in terms of this Part if, on all polling days in the election, he or she will be— (a) on duty as a member of a disciplined force or as an electoral officer; or (b) on duty in the service of the Government outside Zimbabwe; or (c) outside Zimbabwe as the spouse of a person referred to in paragraph; and so unable to vote at a polling station in the constituency. 79. In Konate v Burkina Faso, the African Court adopted the interpretation of the Human Rights Committee that the law providing for the restriction must be sufficiently clear.25 This is similar to the position of the European Court, which 25 Application No. 004/2013 - Lohé Issa Konaté v. Burkina Faso (2014) AFCHPR judgement, para 128 19