alleges that the judge's secretary and the Chief Court Officers acted as official interpreters, which action breached section 31 of the Court's Act. He concluded that these vitiated the trial process and resulted in a breach of his constitutional right to the protection of the Jaw and due process. 12. He submits that he has exhausted all local remedies. Articles alleged to have been violated 13. The Complainant alleges that the Respondent State has violated Articles 2, 3, 5 and 7 of the African Charter. Prayers 14. TI1e Complainant seeks the following: (a) A reversal of the alleged miscarriage of justice; and (b) A review of all the circumstances surrounding his alleged trial and sentence. Procedure 15. The Secretariat received the omplaint by post on acknowledged receipt and informed the Complaj 18' June 2015. The Secretariat ant that the Complaint would be tabled before the Commission for consideration. 16. The Commission was seized of the Communication during its 18th Extra­ ordinary Session held from 29 July to 07 August 2015, and communicated the decision to be seized requeste 17. The to the Parties on 26 August 2015. The Complainant was to submit on admissibility within two months. Complainant's Commission and submissions on admissibility were received at the transmitted to the Respondent State on 19 October 2015. The Complainant submitted revised submissions on 26 October 2015, which were transmitted to the Respondent State on 28 October 2015. 18. The Respondent State submitted on the admissibility of the Communication on 30 Novembe � � � 1:"cCRfTA.1;\oii}' �submissions were transmitted to the Complainant on '°fo 0 0 f 06 June 20 � 'i. < " · '-, � � • . " ' ...;. � AU·UA ' <i,, t.' (f ��(�4.t)?�Al!i£0��':I "'�s� 3