prejudice suffered by PWA, which will also be the seed money to the said fund. B. Non-pecuniary Reparations 389. The Applicant prays the Court for orders for constitutive and legislative measures, rehabilitation, guarantees of non-repetition and measures of just satisfaction. 390. The Respondent State prays the Court to reject the prayers for reparations. *** 391. The Court notes that the Applicants pray for four types of non-pecuniary reparations namely: legislative measures, measures of rehabilitation, guarantees of non-repetition and measures of just satisfaction. The Court will consider them successively. i. Legislative measures 392. The Applicant prays for the following legislative orders: i. Adopt a comprehensive national strategy so as to eliminate attacks against PWA; and ii. Reform its criminal law to classify crimes against PWA as hate crimes with enhanced penalties. *** 393. The Court recalls that, in appropriate cases, it has ordered State Parties to amend their legislation in order to bring it in conformity with the Charter. For example, in Mtikila v. Tanzania, it ordered the Respondent State “to take constitutional, legislative and all other necessary measures within a 88

Select target paragraph3