iii. Reform its criminal law to classify crimes against PWA as hate crimes with enhanced penalties; iv. Assemble a committee of government officials, civil society representatives, PWA or their representatives to identify victims of attacks, compensate them according to the extent of their injuries and provide them with rehabilitation measures; v. Provide adequate housing to the families of PWA who have had to flee their homes as a result of attacks on them or their children; vi. Ensure that children affected by attacks against PWA are provided special educational and vocational assistance programs; vii. Ensure that holding centres for children with albinism are conducive for growth and development and plan for long term reintegration with their families; viii. Carry out nation-wide sensitization of the public to dispel unfounded myths about PWA; ix. Provide effective training to law enforcement officials, prosecutors and judges on the effective investigation and prosecution of offences committed against PWA; x. Set up a fund for advocacy and services in the interests of PWA with participation of PWA in its design, establishment and implementation; and xi. Provide other symbolic reparations as the Court deems appropriate. 27. With respect to jurisdiction and admissibility, the Respondent State prays the Court for the following: i. That the Honourable Court is not vested with jurisdiction to adjudicate over the matter; ii. That the Application has not met the admissibility requirement stipulated under Rule 50(2)(e) of the Rules of Court; iii. That the Application be declared, inadmissible 28. With respect to the merits of the Application, the Respondent State prays the Court for the following: 8