21 TRE TRAKTÖRER AKTIEBOLAG v. SWEDEN JUDGMENT (b) Mr Ravnsborg’s fees - 65 hours’ work at 1,400 SEK per hour (91,000 SEK); (c) the expenses in connection with Mr Ravnsborg’s journeys to Strasbourg for the proceedings before the Commission and the Court (11,000 SEK). 68. The Government, while agreeing to item (c), expressed doubts as to the necessity of item (a). As to item (b), they considered the hourly rate excessive and proposed instead a rate of 700 SEK. 69. Taking into account all relevant circumstances, including the fact that the sole aspect of the case on which the present judgment has found a violation of the Convention is the claim under Article 6 para. 1 (art. 6-1), and making an assessment on an equitable basis, as is required by Article 50 (art. 50), the Court considers that the applicant company is entitled to be reimbursed, for legal costs and expenses, the sum of 60,000 SEK. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT 1. Holds by six votes to one that Article 6 para. 1 (art. 6-1) of the Convention is applicable in the present case in its civil aspect but not in its criminal aspect; 2. Holds by six votes to one that there has been a violation of Article 6 para. 1 (art. 6-1); 3. Holds unanimously that it is not necessary also to examine the case under Article 13 (art. 13) of the Convention; 4. Holds unanimously that Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (P1-1) is applicable in the present case; 5. Holds unanimously that there has been no violation of Article 1 (P1-1); 6. Holds by six votes to one that Sweden is to pay to the applicant company, for costs and expenses, 60,000 (sixty thousand) Swedish crowns; 7. Rejects unanimously the remainder of the claim for just satisfaction. Done in English, and delivered at a public hearing in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 7 July 1989.  Note by the Registrar: As a derogation from the usual practice (Rules 26 and 27 para. 5 of the Rules of Court), the French text was not available until August 1989, but it too is