B. Other conditions of admissibility 50. The Court notes that although no objection has been raised regarding the conditions set out in Rule 50(2) (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (g) of the Rules, it must ensure that the Application fulfils these requirements. 51. From the record, the Court notes that, the Applicant has been clearly identified by name in fulfilment of Rule 50(2) (a) of the Rules. 52. The Court also notes that the claims made by the Applicant seek to protect her rights guaranteed under the Charter. Furthermore, one of the objectives of the Constitutive Act of the African Union, as stated in Article 3(h) thereof, is the promotion and protection of human and peoples’ rights. Additionally, the Application does not contain any claim or prayer that is incompatible with a provision of the said Act. Therefore, the Court considers that the Application is compatible with the Constitutive Act of the African Union and the Charter and holds that it meets the requirement of Rule 50(2)(b) of the Rules. 53. The Court further notes that the Application does not contain any disparaging or insulting language with regard to the Respondent State or its institutions, in compliance with the Rule 50(2) (c) of the Rules. 54. The Application is also not based exclusively on news disseminated through mass media, rather it is based on documents from the municipal courts of the Respondent State. Thus the Application complies with Rule 50 (2) (d) of the Rules. 55. The condition set out in Rule 50 (2) (e) of the Rules is that an application should be filed after exhaustion of local remedies. In this regard, the Court has held that, the Respondent State is deemed to have had the opportunity to redress the violations alleged by the Applicant that arose from those 16