ii. Restore justice where it was overlooked, quash both conviction and sentence imposed on him and release him from prison; and iii. Order any other Order that the Court deems appropriate in the circumstances. 15. On his part, the Second Applicant additionally prays the Court to order the Respondent State to pay him compensation in special damages in the amount this Court may deem fit. 16. The Respondent State prays the Court to grant the following orders with regard to the jurisdiction and admissibility of the Application: i. That the Court is not vested with jurisdiction to adjudicate the Application; ii. That the Application has not met the admissibility requirements provided by Rule 40(5) of the Rules of Court; iii. That the Application has not met the admissibility requirements provided by Rule 40(6) of the Rules of Court; iv. That the Application be declared inadmissible; and v. That the Application be dismissed. 17. With respect to the merits of the Application, the Respondent State prays the Court for the following orders: i. That the Respondent State has not violated the First Applicant’s rights provided under Article 3(2) of the Charter; ii. That the Respondent State has not violated the Applicants’ rights provided under Articles 7(1)(c) of the Charter and Article 10(2) of the Protocol; iii. That the Applicants not be awarded reparations; and iv. That the cost of this Application be borne by the Applicants. 5