inhuman and degrading, as an alternative sentence to life imprisonment for offenders under 18 years; viii. Holds that the Respondent State violated the Second Applicant’s right to defence under Article 7(1)(c) of the Charter as read together with Article 14(3)(d) of the ICCPR, for failure to provide the Second Applicant free legal assistance during domestic proceedings; ix. Holds that the Respondent State violated the Second Applicant’s right to a fair trial under Article 15(1) of the ICCPR by failing to consider a more lenient sentence and imposing life imprisonment on him; x. Holds that the Respondent State violated Article 17(3) of the ACERWC as read jointly with Article 40(1) of the CRC for failing to take into consideration, during sentencing, the age of the Second Applicant at the time of commission of the offence. On reparations Pecuniary reparations xi. Does not grant reparations for material prejudice; xii. Orders the Respondent State to pay the Second Applicant the sum of Tanzanian Shillings One Million (TZS 1,000,000) for moral prejudice ensuing for the violations established in the present Judgment; xiii. Orders the Respondent State to pay the amount indicated under subparagraph (xii) free from taxes within six (6) months, effective from the notification of this judgment, failing which it will pay interest on arrears calculated on the basis of the applicable rate of the Bank of Tanzania throughout the period of delayed payment and until the accrued amount is fully paid. 36