A. Pecuniary reparations i. Material prejudice 116. The Court recalls that for it to grant reparations for material prejudice, there must be a causal link between the violation established by the Court and the prejudice caused and there should be a specification of the nature of the prejudice and proof thereof.44 117. In the instant Application, the Second Applicant submits that at the time of arrest he was a farmer growing a variety of crops and was able to earn an income of approximately Six Hundred and Fifty Thousand Tanzanian Shillings (TZS 650,000) per annum. He also submits that at the time of his arrest he left properties including three hundred (300) kilograms of beans valued at One Hundred and Twenty Thousand Shillings (TZS 120,000); one bike valued at Sixty-Two Thousand Tanzanian Shillings (TZS 62,000); one radio valued at Forty Thousand Tanzanian Shillings (TZS 40,000) and cash of Six Hundred and Seventy-Three Thousand Tanzanian Shillings (TZS 673,000). The Second Applicant therefore prays for the Court to order the Respondent to pay him compensation amounting to Thirteen Million and Twenty-Two Thousand Tanzanian Shillings (TZS 13,022,000) including the value of the stated properties. 118. The Respondent State does not specifically respond to the Second Applicant’s claims but generally prays that he should not be awarded reparations. *** 119. Regarding the Second Applicant’s claims, the Court notes that for the reparation of any material prejudice arising from the violation of any right, 44 Kijiji Isiaga v. Republic of Tanzania, ACtHPR, Application No. 011/2015, Judgment of 25 June 2021 (reparations), § 20. 30