to compensate the victim for expenditure and costs incurred in his or her efforts to obtain justice at the national and international levels. .'° 40. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Court Applicant has to remit probative documents is of the view that the and to develop arguments relating the evidence to the facts under consideration and, when dealing with alleged justification regarding As reparations the grant arises his from claims. clearly Applicant claimed relating the evidence cannot application disbursements, thereof.'* the arguments Court financial and describe bears having to the facts items and burden of proof failed under Furthermore, Consolidated the the to develop the consideration, the considering Applications Nos. that 009 this of 2011 Tanganyika Law Society and The Legal and Human Rights Centre v The United Republic of Tanzania and 011 of 2011 Reverend Christopher R. Mtikila v The United Republic of Tanzania in respect of which the Court decided that each Party should bear its own costs, then it follows that the costs for the current Application should be borne by each Party. ‘3 IACHR Case of Garrido and Baigorria v Argentina. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of 27 August 1998. SeriesC No 39 paragraph79. "4 IACHR Case of Chaparro Alvarez and Lapo IAiguez v Ecuador Preliminary G = - Objections, Merits Reparations and Costs Judgment of 21 November 2007 Series‘CNo 170 paragraph 277. DAN + Kite ec