This head distress, covers and loss such of issues as opportunity. pain This and has suffering, been anguish awarded and in some cases’ while in others the Court has refused to speculate whether there were such losses." 37. With has regard to his claim for non-pecuniary damages, failed damages to produce any evidence were directly caused to support the the Applicant claim that these by the facts of this case. The Court will not speculate on the existence, seriousness and magnitude of the nonpecuniary damages claimed. In any event, in the view of the Court, the finding of a violation by the Respondent in the Court's Judgment of 14 June 2013 and the orders contained therein are just satisfaction for the non-pecuniary damages claimed." B. Legal costs and expenses 38. The Applicant claims Attorney's fees in respect of litigation at the Court amounting to US$ 60,250.00 (Sixty Thousand, Fifty United States Dollars). Two Hundred and . These fees are for the three (3) Counsel and their three (3) assistants. The Applicant claimed that, from early May 2011 to June 2011 when Application 011 of 2011 was filed, each of the 1° Bonisch v Austria 13 EHRR 409 and Weeks v UK 13 EHRR 435 paragraph 13. '! Perks and Others v UK 30 EHRR 33. '2See also Northern International Ireland Court v People's of Justice Republic United of Albania Kingdom (Corfu of Great Channel Britain Case), and Merits, a Judgment of 9 April 1949, /C/ Reports 1949 at 36 and IACHR Case of Garrido and Baigorria v Argentina. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of 27 August 1998. SeriesC— No 39 paragraph79. ASM wow a eo NG oA ) No me os