C. Other conditions of admissibility 54. The Court notes that there is no contention regarding compliance with the conditions set out in Rule 50(2) (a), (b), (c), (d) and (g) of the Rules. Nevertheless, the Court must satisfy itself that these conditions have been met. 55. The record shows that the Applicant has been clearly identified by name, in fulfilment of Rule 50(2)(a) of the Rules. 56. The Court also notes that the claims that are made by the Applicant seek to protect his rights guaranteed under the Charter in conformity with one of the objectives of the Constitutive Act of the African Union (the Constitutive Act), as stated in Article 3(h) thereof, which is the promotion and protection of human and peoples’ rights. Furthermore, the Application does not contain any claim or prayer that is incompatible with a provision of the Constitutive Act. Therefore, the Court considers that the Application is compatible with the Constitutive Act of the African Union and the Charter and holds that it meets the requirements of Rule 50(2)(b) of the Rules. 57. The language used in the Application is not disparaging or insulting to the Respondent State or its institutions or the African Union in fulfilment of Rule 50(2)(c) of the Rules. 58. The Application is not based exclusively on news disseminated through mass media as it is based on court documents from the municipal courts of the Respondent State in fulfilment of Rule 50(2)(d) of the Rules. 59. Further, the Application does not concern a case which has already been settled by the Parties in accordance with the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, the Constitutive Act, the provisions of the Charter or of any legal instrument of the African Union in fulfilment of Rule 50(2)(g) of the Rules. 16