Hissein Habre, there is no Senegalese courts proceedings against the Applicant, not only that there was no an act of pursuit, but no decision of conviction under the reform text that Mr. Hissein Habre is in its application is reached. 24. The Respondent explained that the objections raised by the petitioners refer to the adoption by the State of Senegal to constitutional and legislative reforms, including in the Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure and the adoption of such measures can not constitute violations of Human Rights. 25. The Government of Senegal reports that Mr. Hissein Habre does not establish a violation of the principle of non-retroactivity of criminal law and concludes that the violations alleged by the Applicant are hypothetical and not actual. Concerning the actual use, the Respondent articulates that in the case of a constitutional law individuals are excluded from this right, and indicates that in other areas such right exists because Mr. Hissein Habré was able to capture the indictment of Court of Appeal in Dakar, which upheld his claim. Concerning equality before the law and justice, the State of Senegal observes firstly that the legal provisions criticized by Mr. Hissein Habre are general and impersonal and do not refer by name, and also points out that 'if a trial involving the Complainant, it is unrealistic to bet equality before the law. 26. In total, the State of Senegal states only complying with its international obligations by adapting its legislation to the New York Convention of 1984 and the Statute of the International Criminal Court, and decided to reject all applications by Mr. Hissein Habre. Analysis of the Court 27. The questions of violations of human rights subject to the discretion of the Court can be grouped into five parts namely: