provisions for redress. He further contended that the appropriate procedure is to file Form 48 in the Judgment Enforcement Rules. To her, the Applicant’s action in this suit is essentially one and the same thing with the one the Applicant brought before Nigerian Municipal Courts. He urged the Court to follow its decision in ALIYU TASHEKU Vs FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA (2012) Judgment N° ECW/CCJ/RUL/12/12. Similarly, the Defendant also relied on the decision in ALHAJI HAMMANI TIDJANI Vs FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA & 4 ORS Suit No: ECW/CCJ/APP/01/06 P. 77 at 79. The crux of the decision in these cases is that this Court cannot retry a case on which a judgment of the domestic Court of a member State has already been delivered against which no contestation has been raised. She finally, on this count, submitted that the Applicant is tried under an existing Nigerian Domestic law as such he cannot properly file this suit before this Honourable Court. Furthermore, the Defendant argued that the Application was initiated by a wrong procedure and as such incompetent, thereby divesting this Court of jurisdiction to adjudicate on the same. To 16