126. The Court also recalls that the measures a State may take to remedy a human rights violation include restitution, reparation, victim rehabilitation and measures to ensure that violations do not recur, taking into account the circumstances of each case.24 127. In the present case, the Court has established that the Respondent State violated the Applicant’s right to a fair trial in relation to the challenge of the provisions of Article 236 of the Penal Code. The Court will examine claims of reparation in respect of these violations. A. Pecuniary reparations i. Material prejudice 128. The Applicant makes various prayers for pecuniary reparations in respect of material prejudice. 129. While it does not make any specific prayer regarding material prejudice; the Respondent State prays that the Application be dismissed in its entirety. 130. The Court however notes that it has not, in the present judgment, made any findings or established any violations in relation to the Applicant’s prayers on material prejudice. 131. Accordingly, the Court does not deem it necessary to make any finding on reparation for material prejudice. ii. Moral prejudice 132. The Applicant makes various prayers for pecuniary reparations in respect of moral prejudice. 24 Ingabire Victoire Umuhoza v. Republic of Rwanda, (reparations) (7 December 2018) 2 AfCLR 202, § 20. 35