vi. Two Hundred Thousand (200,000) euros as reparation for moral prejudice resulting from the family and social scandal that continues to haunt her to this day; vii. One Hundred Thousand (100,000) euros as reparation for moral prejudice resulting from being forced to leave her country and reside in France to avoid the disastrous consequences of the violations of which she was a victim. 120. The Applicant also prays the Court to order the Respondent State to implement the provisions of Article 277 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to review the appeal decision of 19 January 2015 rendered by the Nabeul Court of Appeal, and to compel the said court to rule anew upholding her appeal on form and substance, thereby quashing the first-instance judgment No. 8210 of 9 December 2014 rendered by the Grombalia Court, on grounds of flawed proceedings and, as a precautionary measure, to close the case due to the absence of evidence that the Applicant committed a crime Applicant. 121. Finally, as a guarantee of non-repetition, she prays the Court to order the Respondent State to take the following legislative, administrative and judicial measures: i. Help expedite and facilitate the establishment of the Constitutional Court and to make it operational in accordance with the requirements of the Respondent State’s law; ii. Clarify that divorce is the right to terminate a matrimonial union and that neither spouse may be prevented from terminating the matrimonial union or be forced to remain bound [by marriage ties] for reasons that are not a matter of public law. iii. Establish the elements of the crime of adultery, even if in general terms, in order to comply with the principle of legality of crimes; iv. Raise awareness among investigating magistrates, judges and law enforcement officers of the capital importance of the right to liberty and respect for the principles of a fair trial; 33