JOINT SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGES
A.A. CANÇADO TRINDADE, M. PACHECO GÓMEZ AND A. ABREU BURELLI
1.
We, the undersigned Judges, vote in favour of the adoption of the present
Judgment of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the merits in the case of the
Community Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni versus Nicaragua. Given the importance of
the matter raised in the present case, we feel obliged to add the brief reflections that
follow, about one of its central aspects, namely, the intertemporal dimension of the
communal form of property prevailing among the members of the indigenous
communities.
2.
At the public hearing held in the headquarters of the Inter-American Court on
16, 17 and 18 November 2000, two members and representatives of the Community
Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni pointed out the vital importance of the relationship of
the members of the Community with the lands they occupy, not only for their own
subsistence, but also for their family, cultural and religious development. Hence their
characterization of the territory as sacred, for encompassing not only the members of
the Community who are alive,, but also the mortal remains of their ancestors, as well
as their divinities. Hence, for example, the great religious significance of the hills,
inhabited by those divinities.
3.
As one of the members of the Community referred to pointed out in his
testimony in the public hearing before the Court,
"(...) Cerro Urus Asang is a sacred hill since our ancestors because therein we
have buried our grandparents and therefore we call it sacred. Thus, Kiamak is also a
sacred hill because there we have (...) the arrows of our grandparents. Then comes Caño
Kuru Was, it is an old village. Every name we have mentioned in this framework is
sacred.(...)"1.
4.
And he then added that
"(...) Our grandparents lived in this hill, they then had had as their small animals
(...) the monkeys. The utensils of war of our ancestors, our grandparents, were the
arrows. There they are stored.
(...) We maintain our history, since our grandparents.
That is why we have [it] as Sacred Hill. (...) Asangpas Muigeni is spirit of the hill, is of
equal form to a human [being], but is a spirit [who] always lives under the hills. (...)"2.
5.
As an anthropologist observed in his testimony in the public hearing before the
Court, there are two types of sacred places of the members of the Mayagna
Community: a) the hills, where the "spirits of the hill" stay, with whom one "ought to
have a special relation"; and b) in the frontier zones, the cemeteries, where they bury
their dead "within the Community", along the river Wawa, "visited frequently until
nowadays by members of the Community", above all when they "go hunting", up to a
1.
Testimony of Mr. Charlie Webster Mclean Cornelio, in: Inter-American Court of Human Rights
(IACtHR), Case of the Community Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni - Transcripción de la Audiencia Pública sobre el Fondo
Celebrada los Días 16, 17 y 18 de Noviembre de 2000 en la Sede de la Corte, p. 26 (mimeographed, internal circulation).
2.
Ibid., pp. 41-43.