Admissibility iii. Dismisses the objections to the admissibility of the Application; iv. Declares the Application admissible; Merits v. Finds that the Respondent State violated the right to life protected under Article 4 of the Charter; vi. Finds that the Respondent State violated the right to an effective remedy, protected by Article 7(1)(a) of the Charter, read together with Article 1 of the Charter; vii. Finds that the Respondent State violated the Applicants’ right to enjoy the best attainable state of physical and mental health, protected by Article 16 of the Charter; viii. Finds that the Respondent State violated the Applicants’ right to a general satisfactory environment conducive to development, protected under Article 24 of the Charter; ix. Finds that the Respondent State violated the right to receive information, protected by Article 9(1) of the Charter; Reparations Pecuniary Reparations x. Orders the Respondent State to establish, within one (1) year of the notification of this Judgment, in consultation with the victims, a compensation fund to be financed with the amounts received from TRAFIGURA, and additional resources provided by the Respondent State, as necessary, taking into account the census of victims to be conducted as ordered in the present Judgment; xi. Orders the Respondent State to pay each of the Applicants one (1) symbolic CFA Franc for moral prejudice. 64

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents