iii. Declare the Application inadmissible for being time-barred; iv. Declare the Application inadmissible due to other claims related to this Application; v. Declare the Application inadmissible for lack of material jurisdiction to hear allegations of violation of the Algiers Convention; vi. Declare the Application inadmissible for lack of temporal jurisdiction over the alleged violations of the right to life and physical integrity as well as the right to physical and mental health; vii. Declare that the Respondent State complied with its procedural obligations resulting from the violations alleged in the Application; viii. Declare the Application inadmissible for being brought on behalf of victims whose claims are already under consideration before other judges, that is, other judicial bodies; ix. Declare that the Application does not meet the admissibility requirements; x. Declare that no harm was suffered as a result of the alleged violation of rights under the Charter; and xi. Dismiss the Applicants’ claims for damages. V. JURISDICTION 24. Article 3 of the Protocol provides: 1. The jurisdiction of the Court shall extend to all cases and disputes submitted to it concerning the interpretation and application of the Charter, this Protocol and any other relevant Human Rights instrument ratified by the States concerned. 2. In the event of a dispute as to whether the Court has jurisdiction, the Court shall decide. 25. Under Rule 49(1) of the Rules,10 the Court “shall ascertain its jurisdiction and the admissibility of an Application in accordance with the Charter, the Protocol and these Rules.” 10 Article 39(1) of the Rules of Court of 2 June 2010. 10