implementing legislative and regulatory reforms prohibiting and punishing the import and dumping of hazardous waste and holding companies responsible for the protection of human rights and the environment. 22. The Applicants further request the Court to order the Respondent State to: i. Amend its penal code to include general criminal liability for legal persons; ii. Ensure that one or more representatives of the Ministry of the Environment are assigned to all of its ports, and empower the said representatives to monitor waste removal operations from ships, as is done by representatives of the Ministry of Transport; iii. Organize training courses for the concerned officials with a view to sensitise them to issues of human rights and environmental protection, and to include human rights and the environmental protection courses in school and university curricula. iv. Develop, after consultation with victims or victims’ associations, a new, rapid, effective and appropriate compensation program for victims of toxic waste, which necessarily includes setting up a genuine compensation fund, and an updated and public national register of victims; v. Pay a token9 One (1) franc CFA to each Applicant as reparation for moral damage suffered; and vi. Ensure that the Court's decision is disseminated through national print and electronic media outlets and that it is published on the official Government website and remains accessible there for a period of one year from the date of its notification. 23. In its Response, the Respondent State prays the Court to: i. Declare the Application inadmissible; ii. Find that the Application does not meet the admissibility requirements on the ground that the Applicants lack interest; 9 See the brief on the merits and reparations of 2 November 2018, page 24, paragraph 5, Sheet No. 001120. 9