52 Considerations of the Court 155. This Court will determine the pecuniary damage, which presumes the loss of or harm to the income of the victim and, when applicable, her next of kin, and the expenditure incurred as a result of the facts of the case sub judice.111 In this regard, it will establish a compensatory amount that seeks to compensate the patrimonial consequences of the violations declared in this judgment. 156. This Court also observes that, at the public hearing and, extemporaneously, in their brief with final arguments, the representatives of the victim provided a detailed list and requested a fair compensation for pecuniary damage (indirect damage and loss of earnings) for the victim, her parents and siblings. The compensation requested by the representatives is not the same as the compensation requested originally and includes other beneficiaries, such as María Gabriela Escobar Urrutia and René Estuardo Escobar Urrutia, Maritza Urrutia’s niece and nephew. a) Loss of income 157. The representatives of the victim and the Inter-American Commission requested compensation for the loss of earning of Maritza Urrutia and, to this end, they indicated that, at the time of the facts, she carried out political tasks for the Ejército Guerrillero de los Pobres and was a primary school teacher, and carried out “other productive work such as giving private classes; she also worked “up until the facts, as a research assistant on child psychology.” The representatives indicated that Maritza Urrutia received a monthly salary of US$500.00 (five hundred United States dollars). Moreover, in her statement before the Court on February 21, 2003, the victim indicated that: [a]t that time, [she] was working with Elizabeth de Ruano. She is a psychologist and I helped her to conduct tests in different nursery schools. At that time, I was also connected with the revolutionary organization “Ejército Guerrillero de los Pobres.” 158. In view of the foregoing, the Court observes that there are no suitable vouchers in the file confirming the salary the victim received for her activities at the time of her abduction and detention. Moreover, the victim was forced to leave Guatemala for the United States, where she remained for several days and she then moved to Mexico, where she lived for six years. In the latter country, she carried out miscellaneous tasks and received an income. For loss of earning, the Court establishes, in fairness, the sum of US$5,000.00 (five thousand United States dollars) as compensation in favor of Maritza Urrutia García. b) Indirect damage 159. Based on the information received, the case law of the Court and the facts of the case, the Court declares that the compensation for pecuniary damage should also include: a) A sum of money corresponding to the expenditure incurred by the victim in order to purchase plane tickets to travel to the United States and to Mexico, and also for telephone calls. In this respect, the Court considers it 111 Cf. Juan Humberto Sánchez case, supra note 14, para. 162; Trujillo Oroza case. Reparations, supra note 97, para. 65; and Bámaca Velásquez case. Reparations, supra note 105, para. 43.