f. Issue a judgement compelling the Respondent State to annul the death sentence issued against the Victim; g. Request the Respondent State to compensate the Victim and his family the equivalent amount of Fifty (50) Million United States Dollars, for the harm and damage caused to him and his family; h. Request the creation of an independent court outside Egypt to try the Victim for the charges brought against him. Procedure 15. The Secretariat received the Complaint on 16 April 2016 and acknowledged receipt of the same. 16. The Commission was seized of this Communication during the 20th Extra­ Ordinary Session held from 09 to June 18 2016, in Banjul, The Gambia, following which the decision on seizure was transmitted to both parties. 17. On 06 June 2016 and 17 June 2016 respectively, the Secretariat informed both Parties of its decision to be seized of the Communication. The letter to the Complainants requested submission of arguments on the admissibility of the Communication within two months of the notification, as stipulated in Rule 105(1) of the Rules of Procedure (2010). 18. On 17 May 2021, the Secretariat informed the Complainants that the Communication would be tabled for striking out for want of diligent prosecution, on account of the Complainant's failure to respond to the Commission's request for submissions on the admissibility of the Communication, and further that the deadline for doing so had passed. Analysis of the Commission on Strike Out: 19. Rule 105(1) of the Commission's Rule of Procedure (2010) provides that when the Commission is seized of a Complaint, it shall request the Complainant to present evidence and arguments on the admissibility of the Communication within two (2) months. 20. Additionally, Rule 113 of the Commission's Rules of Procedure (2010) provides that when a deadline is fixed for a particular submission, either Party may apply to the Commission for an extension of the stipulated period and the Commission may grant the said application. 4