0013? lt 4 that, the government of the United Republic of Tanzania has not violated the Applicants' Right to fair trial. l that, the government of the United Republic of Tanzania has not delayed the Applicants' Application to Review the Court of Appeal decision in Criminal Appeal No. 43 of 2012. IV that the Applicants were properly identified at the scene of the crime that there was no contravention of Section 235(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Cap 20, RE 2002). VI that the improper rendering of sentence by the High Court was cured by the Court of Appeal of Tanzania in Criminal Appeal No. 43 of 2009. vlt that the conviction and sentence imposed on the Applicants by the High Court during trial and upheld by the Court of Appeal of Tanzania was lawful and proper. vil 17. that the Application be dismissed for lack of merit." With respect to reparations, the Respondent State prays the Court to dismiss the Applicants' prayers in their entirety for lack of justification or supporting documents. V. JURISDIGTION 18. Pursuant to Article 3 of the Protocol 1. The jurisdiction of the Court shall extend to all cases and disputes submitted to it concerning the interpretation and application of the Charter, this Protocol and any other relevant human rights instruments ratified by the States concerned. 2. In the event of a dispute as to whether the Court has jurisdiction, the Court shall decide. 8