claims, proves that the Respondent State violated his rights protected under Articles 2 and 3 of the Charter. Ill. | BRIEF BACKGROUND 6. By the OF THE MATTER initial Application No. 001/2017, filed on 16 January Applicant alleged that he was denied justice in the Supreme 2017, the Court of the Respondent State in violation of his rights protected under the Charter. Es According Review to the Applicant, Bench the truncation of the Supreme Court of the judicial of the Respondent process State by the and its assumption of jurisdiction in his case violated his rights to have his cause ~ heard and to non-discrimination alleged that the Review Bench, protected under the Charter. He also as constituted, was impartial and that the comments of one of the Judges, displayed bias. 8. On 28 June 2019, the Court rendered the judgment on the initial Application wherein it held: v. Finds that the Respondent State has not violated Article 2 of the Charter on the right to non-discrimination; vi. Finds that the Respondent State has not violated Article 3 of the Charter on equality before the law and equal protection of the law. vii. | Finds that the Respondent State has not violated Article 7 (1) of the Charter on the right to have one’s cause heard by a competent tribunal. vii. | Finds that the Respondent State has not violated Article 7 (1) (d) of the Charter on the right to be tried by an impartial tribunal in respect to the composition of the Review Bench of the Supreme Court. ix. Finds that the Respondent State has not violated Article 7 (1) (d) of the Charter in respect to the remarks made by Justice Dotse in