00{{3 xv t 4 Frnds that the Respondent State violated the Applicant's right of property provided under Article 14 of the Charter; Frnds that the Respondent State violated Article 26 of the Charter for having failed in its duty to guarantee the independence of the Courts; XX Frnds that the Respondent State violated the Applicant's right to two-tier jurisdiction guaranteed by Article 14(5) of ICCPR, given that Article 19, paragraph 2 of the 2 July 2018 Law establishing CRIET provides that the decisions of this court are not subject to appeal; xxl Flnds that the Respondent State violated the principle of "non bis in idem" provided for under Article 14(7) of ICCPR; On reparations xxii. Orders the Respondent State to take all the necessary measures to annul judgment No. 007/3C.COR delivered on 18 October 2018 by CRIET in a way that erases all its effects and to report thereon to the Court within six (6) months from the date of notification of this Judgment; xxiii. Declares that it will rule on other claims for reparation at a later stage; On cosfs XXIV Declares that the Court will make a ruling on the issue of reparation at a later stage." 3. Having found in its judgment on the merits that the Respondent State violated the Applicant's rights and ruled partly on the reparations, the Court deferred its decision on other forms of reparation. lt will rule on the said forms of reparation in this judgment pursuant to Article 27(1) of the Protocol. II. 4. BRIEF BACKGROUND OF THE CASE On 27 February 2017, the Applicant filed an Application with this Court alleging that in the course of the legal proceedings against him for alleged international drug J