00fi0| of the 2 July 2018 law establishing CRIET provides that the decisions of that court are not subject to appeal. 127. On the above two points, the Court considers that the Respondent State must take the necessary measures to review the two provisions of the law establishing CRIET to have them comply with the provisions of Articles 3(2) of the Charter and 14(5) of the ICCPR.23 v. Non-application of the judgment of 29 March 2019 and the censure of opposition political parties or their leaders 128. The Applicant submits that despite the measures required by the Court in its Order of 7 December 2018 and in its judgment of 29 March 2019, the Respondent State obstinately failed to comply with the measures ordered and has, instead, taken measures against him, thereby continuously violating his rights. 129. He further alleges that the Respondent State, by a series of acts, violates his civil and political rights as well as those of the leaders of the opposition parties in Benin. The Applicant requests the Court to note the said violations against him and the other leaders of the opposition political parties, including Thomas Yayi Boni and LionelZinsou. 130. The Respondent State objects to the examination of the Applicant's new allegations and prays the Court to disregard them. 23 See ACHPR, Communication No. 231/99. Lawyers without Borders v. Burundi, November 2000 (28th Session); Communication No.218/98. Civil Liberties Organization, Legal Defense Centre, Legal Defense and Assrsfance Project v. Nigeria, May 2001 (29th Session). Seealso HRC, Sudrezde Guerrerov. Colombia,311311982, CCPR/C/15/D/4511979, g 15; Cesarlo G6mez Vdzquez v. Spain, 111812000, CCPR/C/69/D/701/1996, S 13. JJ