00{{as 35.1n the Judgment on the merits, the Court held that the Respondent State's suspension of SOCOTRAC SARL's container terminal and the withdrawal of customs brokerage license violated Article 14 of the ICCPR. lt further notes that a link between the violations of Articles 5 and 7(1)(c) of the Charter and the prejudice suffered by the Applicant was established in the judgment on the merits. 36.The Court notes that the decrease in turnover of COMON SA and SOCOTRAC SARL caused the Applicant loss of profit and loss of asset valuation of his shares. Loss of profit 3T.Regarding profit losses, evidence adduced by the Applicant dated 13 August 2018 and received by the Registry on 17 August 2018 shows that between 2015 and 2017 , COMON SA and SOCOTRAC SARL respectively, recorded a net profit loss of seven billion two hundred million five hundred and sixty-eight thousand seven hundred and sixty-four (7,200,568,764) CFA Francs and eighty-seven million three hundred and seventy-eight thousand nine hundred and five (87,378,905) CFA Francs, calculated on the basis of the profit made by each of them in 2015. 38.|n this regard, and in view of the fact that these losses result from violations of the Applicant's rights, the Court awards him the benefit of the pro rata reparation of his shares which represent respectively, 60% in coMoN sA and 40o/o in socorRAC, that is, a total of Four billion three hundred and fifty-nine million six hundred and sixtyone thousand seven hundred and sixty-five (4,359,661,765) CFA Francs. 39.on the other hand, regarding the drop-in turnover and profit losses in JLR sA, scl L'ELlrE, CAJAF sA and IDEAL PRoDUCTtoN SARL, the court notes that the Applicant merely produced supporting documents and the Articles of Association of the said companies without stating the losses he suffered and the numerical value thereof. As the Applicant did not substantiate his claims with documentary evidence, the said claims are dismissed. I k 4 @