17. On 24 October 2018, the Registry notified the Respondent State of the Applicant's new allegations. 18. On 26 October 2018, the Applicant filed another letter in which he referred to the CRIET judgment No. 007/3C.COR of 18 October 2018 convicting him, and prayed the Court to issue, as an interim measure, an order for a stay of execution of the said judgment. This letter was registered in the Registry on 31 October 2018. 19. On 31 October 2018, the Registry received from the Applicant a letter dated the same day by which the Applicant tendered the record of proceedings of the General Assembly of Cotonou Magistrates highlighting the illegality of CRIET, and requested the Court to take all appropriate measures, including a stay of execution of the judgment delivered by CRIET until examination of the cassation appeal. 20. On 5 November 2018, the Applicant addressed to the Court a corrigendum to the letter dated 31 October 2018, requesting the Court to consider a stay of execution of the judgment of CRIET until its decision and not until consideration of the cassation appeal. The said letter was received at the Registry on 20 November 2018 and served on the Respondent State on the same day. 21. On 7 November 2018, the Registry notified the Respondent State of the Ap'plicant's letters dated 26 and 31 October 2018, respectively. 22. On 12 November 2018, the Applicant reiterated his request for a stay of execution of CRIET judgment in a letter received at the Registry on 19 November 2018 and served on the Respondent State on 20 November 2018. 23. On 13 November 2018, the Respondent State submitted its observations on admissibility of the new allegations filed by the Applicant. The 5