decided to refer the matter back to the Court of First lnstance of Bamako District V 12.As at the time of referral to this Court by the Applicants on 1 July, 2016, proceedings were pending before the Court of First lnstance of Bamako District V. B. ALLEGED VIOLATIONS 13. The Applicants allege that the Mali national courts, seized of the dispute between them and Boussourou, did an incorrect classification of the facts of the case. They assert that the fact of classifying the acts of their aggressor as assault rather than attempted murder with premeditation resulted in the violation of their dignity and rights under international human rights instruments, in particular: "The right to dignity and the right to protection from ail forms of violence and torture as provided under Article 3 of the Maputo protocol, Article 5 of the charter, Article 7 of the lccpR and Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR); ii. lll ousmane's right to education as provided under Article 17 of the charter and Article 1 1 of the African charter on the Rights and wetfare of the child; Mariam's right to work as provided under Article 1s of the charter; The right to health as provided under Article 16 of the charter, Article 14 (1) of the Maputo Protocol and Article 14 of the African charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child; V The right of access to justice and the right to reparation as provided under Article 7 of the charter and Article 6 of the Maputo protocol,, 14.The Applicants contend, lastly, that the Respondent State is liable for all the afore-mentioned violations for having failed in its obligation to conduct an in- depth and impartial investigation leading to a fair classification of the offence 4 lG ,q