iv. Publication of the judgment 128. The Parties did not submit on this point. *** 129. However, the Court considers that, in line with its settled jurisprudence and having regard to the particular circumstances of the present case, the publication of the present Judgment is warranted. Under the current legislation of the Respondent State, threats to life inherent in the mandatory nature of the death penalty persist. The Court notes that there is no indication that the necessary steps have been taken to amend the law and align it with the Respondent State’s international obligations. The Court therefore considers it appropriate to order the publication of this judgment within three months of the date of notification. v. Implementation and reporting 130. The Parties did not submit on this point. *** 131. The grounds for Court’s decision to order the publication of this Judgment, notwithstanding the absence of an express request from the Parties, also apply as regards implementation and the submission of reports. With regard specifically to implementation, the Court notes that in its earlier judgments ordering the repeal of the provision on the mandatory death penalty, it ordered the Respondent State to implement the decisions within one year 29