111. In view of the foregoing, and in line with its established jurisprudence, the Court awards the Applicant the sum of Three Hundred Thousand Tanzanian shillings (TZ300,000) as reparation for moral prejudice suffered. b. Moral prejudice suffered by the Applicant’s family members 112. The Applicant submits that his close relatives suffered moral prejudice as a result of his imprisonment, given that he was responsible for them. 113. The Respondent State submits that the request should be dismissed. 114. The Court notes that the Applicant does not prove a family or marriage relationship with the alleged indirect victims. The Court therefore dismisses the request for reparation for non-pecuniary damage suffered by the indirect victims. B. Non-pecuniary reparations 115. The Applicant prays the Court to vacate the death sentence imposed on him and remove him from death row. He also prays the Court to order the Respondent State to release him. i. Vacation of the death penalty and removal from death row 116. The Applicant prays the Court to vacate the death sentence imposed on him. * 117. The Respondent State submits that the Applicant’s request for reparations be dismissed. *** 118. With regard to the request to vacate the death sentence imposed on the Applicant, the Court recalls that it has held that measures seeking 26