216. However, it was up to the Applicant to demonstrate the number of days of his leave that were accrued. 217. For in this regard the burden of proof was on the Applicant insofar as it was not impossible for him to obtain from the administrative services a statement proving the number of days of his accrued leave. 218. Therefore, the Court finds that the Applicant's argument is not sufficient to conclude that the administrative and financial services erred in calculating the number of accrued leave days in his favor. 219. Consequently, the Court concludes that for lack of evidence, the Applicant's claim in this regard cannot stand. XII – REPARATION 220. It should be noted, by way of conclusion that this Court found that, the Applicants were recruited in the category of professional staff and under fixed-term contracts; they performed their duties until the termination of their contracts. 221. With the termination of the respective contracts, their benefits have been settled, but not paid: 1. The resettlement allowance provided for in Article 35(b) and equivalent to 3 months of his salary, to Applicant ZANNOUBO Vinagnon in the amount of FCFA 7,836,828; 2. The separation allowance provided in Article 35(d) to each of the Applicants, for the duration of their respective contracts, as follows: 41