0 23. 0050 I On 9 April 2018, the Parties were informed of the close of the written procedure and that there would be no public hearing on the matter. IV. 24 PRAYERS OF THE PARTIES The prayers of the Applicant, as submitted in the Application, are: *i. This Hon. Court on Human and People's (sic) Rights to declare the respondent (sic) administrative omission unconstitutional. ii. Declaratory order to enable the applicant be immediately (with time limit) supplied with copies of proceeding(sic) and Judgment (sic), and if the opposes (fail to supply), order the immediate release of the applicant from prison. iii. iv. Costs to follow the event, and Any other order(s)/relief(s) that would suit the current and future interest of justice in the circumstances of the case. v. That, this Hon. Court be pleased to grant the applicants(sic) prayer to be facilitated with free legal representation or legal assistance as governed by Rule 31 of the Rules of the court and Article 10(2) of the protocol on the court." 25. ln the Reply to the Respondent State's Response, the Applicant also prays the Court to declare: "That: Since the respondent state (The United Republic of Tanzania) has violated the applicant's rights provide (sic) under Article 2, 3 (1) and (2) and 7(1) (a) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Right be pleased to grant and declare orders of merits expressed in this (sic) grounds. That: the application declared has merit and be granted with costs following the event." 26. ln its Response, with regard to the admissibility of the Application, the Respondent State prays the Court to rule: ta That the Application has not met the admissibility requirements provided under Rule 40(5) of the Rules and Article 6(2) of the Protocol. 7 Sk