legal representatives were causing damage to the Respondent State's reputation by defending the first Victim and involving international human rights organisations in the case. The travel ban was subsequently lifted on 20 September 2014 by the Bar Association, which directed the petitioner to submit the Complaint to the police. ARTICLES ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN VIOLATED: 18. The Complainants alleged the violation of Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 16, and 18 of the African Charter. PRAYERS: 19. The Complainants (a) request the Commission to:- find that the Respondent has of the African Charter; (b) declare that the Respondent is to ensure that effective remedies ; ~, , (c) recommend restitution of theV " situation they were in before the violations of'the.African (d) hal !5e' recomII\~;R; the VictiIIl~ compen~~~ed fori~aterial harm arising from the loss of the"First Victim's land, businesses and properties, and non-material harm arising from physical and psychological suffering. , 'If,";,;"ok " rompt and imRartiaJ~investigation . n, convicti I" and sentencing. (f) recommend a public acknqty into the First Victim's arrest, dgement of the facts and a public apology for the violap,pns OX,tl1e 'A,fric~n Charter suffered by the Complainants. (g) recomDi~pd changes to the Respondent's legislation, including the current and 'W'·,~" any future'Constitution and the Sudanese Criminal Code, to ensure its alignment with the African Charter; and (h) recommend other institutional and policy reforms. PROCEDURE: 20.