cannot be held responsible for any ethnic unrest which are actions that constitute a breach. That it cannot be held responsible for crimes committed by unidentified and unknown persons particularly, since such perpetrators of ethnic unrest are entirely unknown and unconnected to the defendant or any of its agencies. That the Plaintiffs did not disclose any actionable wrong done to them by the Defendant that would warrant the Court making the orders sought by the Plaintiffs. That the Plaintiffs’ claim for damages is not substantiated by the facts to support any assessment of damages in their favor. The Defendant urged the Honorable Court to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ claim as same is frivolous, speculative, vexatious, baseless, incompetent and an abuse of Court process. Analysis by the Court: From the submission of the Parties in this case, two major issues calls for determination namely: however both can be subsumed in the first question, 1. Whether from the totality of facts adduced, this action as constituted and conceived can be entertained by this Court. 2. Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to the reliefs sought 13