considerations against the right to equitable education without discrimination. 320. The Court observes as submitted by the amici that in order for children with disabilities to ‘access education’, it requires them to be reasonably accommodated including being provided with: Large print learning materials, assistive devices including glasses, extra time during exams and ensuring that teachers are trained on albinism. 321. Furthermore, their security should be guaranteed to and from school. In this regard, the Court notes the Respondent State’s submission which is buttressed by the report of the Independent Expert on the Enjoyment of Human Rights by Persons with Albinism that, it has provided some assistive devices to children with albinism. 322. The Court, however, notes that some children with albinism have been denied the opportunity to attend mainstream schools and are therefore forced to learn braille. The Court also notes that the Respondent State has not discharged its obligation as regards providing of assistive devices. 323. The Court is alive to the fact that the right to education is a social, economic and cultural right which requires adequate finances but that does not excuse the Respondent State from reasonably accommodating children with albinism, who are already marginalised and anxiously face death threats on a daily basis. The Court therefore concludes that the education is not available or accessible to the children with albinism. 324. The education system especially in the shelters is also not acceptable or adaptable, as discussed above, due to the overcrowding, the lack of training of the teachers and the lack of provision of assistive devices. 325. In the circumstances, the Court finds that the Respondent State has violated the right to education under Article 17(1) of the Charter and Article 11 of the 73