and there by become influenced as it is required in regular trial in our courts. More than that, the individual senators here who are also jurors not only go home every day and discuss matters pertaining to this impeachment proceedings, but some of them have even gone on the airwaves and discussed the case. Had this been a regular trial, such jurors will not be permitted to serve on the panel. Moreover, we take a look around and see that a good number of the Senators are not even here as their verdict is being brought. This means that the rules pertaining to regular jury trial in court are much more relaxed in this proceedings”. 146. The above position of the Court of Impeachment reveals palpable infractions of the Amended Rule 63 particularly Section 11 thereof which states as follows: Except otherwise provided in these Rules and the Constitution, the trial of any impeachment shall be conducted in keeping with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law and the practice generally obtained in felony cases before trial courts in Liberia”. 147. In the case of TAXQUET V. BELGIUM 926/05 (MERITS AND JUST SATISFACTION) | | JUDGMENT COURT (GRAND CHAMBER) | 16/11/2010, the grand chamber considering the margin of appreciation of mode of trial permissible in the conduct of judicial systems held that: 60