and 10(1) and (2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 10. By way of specification, he submitted that the Plaintiff/applicant was detained under a holding Charge procedure by the magistrate and he was remanded thereafter detention was a violation pursuant Human since 2003 to date of the Plaintiffs/applicant's and that human such rights to Articles Six (6) and Seven (7) of the African Charter on and People's detention Rights and urge the Court as illegal, null and void. He relied introduced to adjudge such on the new evidence in their motion whereby they relied on exhibits OAT (letter to the Comptroller) 2012 in prison and OA2- Applicant's- two letters dated 21st February, addressed to the Deputy-Comptroller, Kiri-kiri Maximum Prison by the firm of Smith Worth Partners who are the solicitors to the applicant. 11. He further relied on exhibit 0 •.<\3 to wit, charge no C/61/2003 against the applicant, on which he was arraigned before the Yaba Magistrate Court Lagos and the order made by the said Magistrate 200:3 that the applicant should be remanded Court on 16th May, in Kiri-kiri Maximum Prison, Lagos. Also attached to the affidavit is exhibit O.A.tt- which is, the Court Order. 12. He also relied on a sworn affidavit by the applicant himself on 2nd February, 2012 in Kiri-kiri Maximum Security Prison before Mr. Kamal' Raji-a Notary Public marked as exhibit 0.,\,). He submitted the alternative the '. that the court should note the Deputy Comptroller's failure to produce tJ e detention warrant is in Kiri-kiri in addition in Maximum Security Plaintiff/applicant had in respect of the: appiicar; ..\ :;'1 Prison. He urged the Court to hold that proved his ca. e as contained in the application to enable this Court to make an order releasing the applicant from detention. The defendant however, argued vehemently in response 5